Real-time Detection of Cellular Metabolism: a New Trend for Intra-Operative Diagnosis of Cavity Margins Intraoperative CDP
Main Article Content
Keywords
Breast Cancer, Intraoperative assessment, Surgical Margin, breast conserving surgery
Abstract
Not applicable
References
1. Glorioso JM, Gonzalez Juarrero AB, Rodysill BR, Harmsen WS, Habermann EB, Carter JM, et al. Margin Proximity Correlates with Local Recurrence After Mastectomy for Patients Not Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy. Annals of surgical oncology, (2017) 24(11), 3148–56. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5968-2.
2. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Clin Oncol. (2014) 32(14), 1507–1515. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3935.
3. Pilewskie M, Morrow M. Margins in breast cancer: How much is enough? Cancer, (2018) 124(7), 1335–1341. doi:10.1002/cncr.31221.
4. Versteegden DPA, Keizer LGG, Schlooz-Vries MS, Duijm LEM, Wauters CAP, Strobbe LJA. Performance characteristics of specimen radiography for margin assessment for ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):669-679. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4475-2.
5. Surace A, Gentile S, Raponi A, Pasquero G, Tota D, Baù MG. Surgical Margins Status Assessment After Breast Conserving Surgery: Is There a Difference Between Surgeon and Radiologist Evaluation?. Arch Breast Cancer, (2021) 8,1:16-20. doi: 10.32768/abc.20218116-20.
6. Najafi M, Salmon R, Kaviani A. Oncological Outcome of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Review of the Literature. Arch Breast Cancer, (2015) 2(1):5-14. doi: 10.19187/abc.2015215-14.
7. Elahi A, Toogeh G, Mahmoodzadeh H, Jahanbin B, Shahi F, Kalaghchi B, et al. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Close to the Inked Margin: A Case Presented in Multidisciplinary Session With Clinical Discussion and Decision Making. Arch Breast Cancer, (2018) 2:58-62. doi: 10.19187/abc.20185258-62.
8. Miripour ZS, Abbasvandi F, Aghaee P, Shojaeian F, Faramarzpour M, Mohaghegh P, et al. Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real-time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non-neoadjuvant cases. Cancer medicine, (2022) 10.1002/cam4.4503. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4503.
9. Dabbagh N, Abbasvandi F, Miripour ZS, Hoseinpour P, Jahanbakhshi F, Moradi A, et al. Accuracy of cancer diagnostic probe for intra-surgical checking of cavity side margins in neoadjuvant breast cancer cases: A human model study. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS, (2022) 18(1), e2335. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2335.
10. Mahdavi R, Mehrvarz S, Hoseinpour P, Yousefpour N, Abbasvandi F, Tayebi M, et al. Intraradiological pathology-calibrated electrical impedance spectroscopy in the evaluation of excision-required breast lesions. Medical physics, (2022) 10.1002/mp.15481. doi:10.1002/mp.15481
11. King ME, Zhang J, Lin JQ, Garza KY, DeHoog RJ, Feider C, et al. Rapid diagnosis and tumor margin assessment during pancreatic cancer surgery with the MasSpec Pen technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (2021) 118(28), e2104411118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104411118
12. Dabbagh N, Abbasvandi F, Miripour ZS, Hoseinpour P, Jahanbakhshi F, Moradi A, et al. Accuracy of cancer diagnostic probe for intra-surgical checking of cavity side margins in neoadjuvant breast cancer cases: A human model study. Int J Med Robot. 2022 Feb;18(1):e2335. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2335.
13. Miripour ZS, Abbasvandi F, Aghaee P, NajafiKhoshnoo S, Faramarzpour M, Mohaghegh P, et al. Electrochemical tracing of hypoxia glycolysis by carbon nanotube sensors, a new hallmark for intraoperative detection of suspicious margins to breast neoplasia. Bioengineering & translational medicine, (2021) 7(1), e10236. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10236.
2. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Clin Oncol. (2014) 32(14), 1507–1515. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3935.
3. Pilewskie M, Morrow M. Margins in breast cancer: How much is enough? Cancer, (2018) 124(7), 1335–1341. doi:10.1002/cncr.31221.
4. Versteegden DPA, Keizer LGG, Schlooz-Vries MS, Duijm LEM, Wauters CAP, Strobbe LJA. Performance characteristics of specimen radiography for margin assessment for ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):669-679. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4475-2.
5. Surace A, Gentile S, Raponi A, Pasquero G, Tota D, Baù MG. Surgical Margins Status Assessment After Breast Conserving Surgery: Is There a Difference Between Surgeon and Radiologist Evaluation?. Arch Breast Cancer, (2021) 8,1:16-20. doi: 10.32768/abc.20218116-20.
6. Najafi M, Salmon R, Kaviani A. Oncological Outcome of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Review of the Literature. Arch Breast Cancer, (2015) 2(1):5-14. doi: 10.19187/abc.2015215-14.
7. Elahi A, Toogeh G, Mahmoodzadeh H, Jahanbin B, Shahi F, Kalaghchi B, et al. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Close to the Inked Margin: A Case Presented in Multidisciplinary Session With Clinical Discussion and Decision Making. Arch Breast Cancer, (2018) 2:58-62. doi: 10.19187/abc.20185258-62.
8. Miripour ZS, Abbasvandi F, Aghaee P, Shojaeian F, Faramarzpour M, Mohaghegh P, et al. Human study on cancer diagnostic probe (CDP) for real-time excising of breast positive cavity side margins based on tracing hypoxia glycolysis; checking diagnostic accuracy in non-neoadjuvant cases. Cancer medicine, (2022) 10.1002/cam4.4503. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4503.
9. Dabbagh N, Abbasvandi F, Miripour ZS, Hoseinpour P, Jahanbakhshi F, Moradi A, et al. Accuracy of cancer diagnostic probe for intra-surgical checking of cavity side margins in neoadjuvant breast cancer cases: A human model study. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS, (2022) 18(1), e2335. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2335.
10. Mahdavi R, Mehrvarz S, Hoseinpour P, Yousefpour N, Abbasvandi F, Tayebi M, et al. Intraradiological pathology-calibrated electrical impedance spectroscopy in the evaluation of excision-required breast lesions. Medical physics, (2022) 10.1002/mp.15481. doi:10.1002/mp.15481
11. King ME, Zhang J, Lin JQ, Garza KY, DeHoog RJ, Feider C, et al. Rapid diagnosis and tumor margin assessment during pancreatic cancer surgery with the MasSpec Pen technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (2021) 118(28), e2104411118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104411118
12. Dabbagh N, Abbasvandi F, Miripour ZS, Hoseinpour P, Jahanbakhshi F, Moradi A, et al. Accuracy of cancer diagnostic probe for intra-surgical checking of cavity side margins in neoadjuvant breast cancer cases: A human model study. Int J Med Robot. 2022 Feb;18(1):e2335. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2335.
13. Miripour ZS, Abbasvandi F, Aghaee P, NajafiKhoshnoo S, Faramarzpour M, Mohaghegh P, et al. Electrochemical tracing of hypoxia glycolysis by carbon nanotube sensors, a new hallmark for intraoperative detection of suspicious margins to breast neoplasia. Bioengineering & translational medicine, (2021) 7(1), e10236. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10236.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Abdolahad M, Kaviani A. Real-time Detection of Cellular Metabolism: a New Trend for Intra-Operative Diagnosis of Cavity Margins: Intraoperative CDP. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 21 [cited 2023 Mar. 29];10(1):1-3. Available from: https://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/638
Section
Editorial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright©. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, except for commercial purposes.
Article Statistics :Views : 214 | Downloads : 116 : 27