Real-World Experience Using the Clinical Treatment Score at 5 Years (CTS5) and Breast Cancer Index (BCI) to Guide Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy BCI vs. CTS5

Mohammed Qarmout (1), Yasir Alsaraf (2), Qasim Alameri (3), Grace Brannan (4), Susan Lyons (5)
(1) Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital Southfield, MI, USA, United States,
(2) Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital Southfield, MI, USA, United States,
(3) Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Southfield, MI, USA, United States,
(4) GDB Research and Statistical Consulting LLC, 8834 Lavelle Rd, Athens, Ohio, USA, United States,
(5) Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital Southfield, MI, USA, United States

Abstract

Background: Accurately identifying patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+HER2 breast cancer benefiting from extended endocrine therapy (EET) remains challenging. While the Clinical Treatment Score at 5 Years (CTS5) and the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) are established tools for assessing late recurrence risk, their comparative utility in real-world practice is underexplored. The CTS5 only provides prognostic data, but the BCI provides both prognostic and predictive data.


Methods: We conducted a retrospective study evaluating concordance between the CTS5 and the BCI in patients with early-stage ER+HER2 disease who completed 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (2023–2024). Intertest reliability was quantified using descriptive statistics and the Cohen κ coefficient.


Results: In 59 patients, overall concordance was 37.3%. Agreement was highest in low-risk, grade 1 tumors (54.5%). Discordance was significant in those with higher-risk features. Notably, 32.2% were CTS5 “intermediate,” where the BCI offered binary guidance. Sankey diagrams revealed that 57.1% of patients with BCI-recommended EET were CTS5 low risk. The Cohen κ coefficient was 0.067 (95% CI, −0.156 to 0.290; P = 0.56).


Conclusion: Our study showed limited CTS5 and BCI concordance rates in clearly low-risk populations and non-statistically significant results overall. These limited findings warrant further exploration of integrating genomic assays to optimize therapy duration.

References

Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, Davies C, Taylor C, McGale P, et al. 20-year risks of breast-cancer recurrence after stopping endocrine therapy at 5 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1836-1846. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1701830.

Goss PE, Muss HB, Ingle JN, Whelan TJ, Wu M. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: Current status and future directions. Clin Breast Cancer. 2008;8(5):411-417. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2008.n.049.

Burstein HJ, Lacchetti C, Anderson H, Buchholz TA, Davidson NE, Gelmon KA, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(5):423-438. doi: 10.1200/jco.18.01160.

Gnant M, Sestak I, Filipits M, Dowsett M, Balic M, Lopez-Knowles E, et al. Identifying clinically relevant prognostic subgroups of postmenopausal women with node-positive hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: A combined analysis of ABCSG-8 and ATAC using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score and intrinsic subtype. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(8):1685-1691. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv215.

Dowsett M, Sestak I, Regan MM, Dodson A, Viale G, Thürlimann B, et al. Integration of clinical variables for the prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer treated with 5 years of endocrine therapy: CTS5. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1941-1948. doi: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.4258.

Sgroi DC, Sestak I, Cuzick J, Zhang Y, Schnabel CA, Schroeder B, et al. Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: A prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(11):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70387-5.

Zhang Y, Schnabel CA, Schroeder BE, Jerevall PL, Jankowitz RC, Fornander T, et al. Breast cancer index identifies early-stage estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer patients at risk for early- and late-distant recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(15):4196-4205. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0804.

Bartlett JMS, Xu K, Wong J, Pond G, Zhang Y, Spears M, et al. Validation of the prognostic performance of breast cancer index in hormone receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients in the TEAM trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30(8):1509-1517. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2436.

Shah S, Shaing C, Khatib J, Lodrigues W, Dreadin-Pulliam J, Anderson BB, et al. The utility of breast cancer index (BCI) over clinical prognostic tools for predicting the need for extended endocrine therapy: A safety net hospital experience. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(8):823-827. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.08.003.

Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, Gray R, Arriagada R, Raina V, et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9869):805-816. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61963-1.

Authors

Mohammed Qarmout
Yasir Alsaraf
Qasim Alameri
Grace Brannan
Susan Lyons
slyons5@hfhs.org (Primary Contact)
1.
Qarmout M, Alsaraf Y, Alameri Q, Brannan G, Lyons S. Real-World Experience Using the Clinical Treatment Score at 5 Years (CTS5) and Breast Cancer Index (BCI) to Guide Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: BCI vs. CTS5. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 25 [cited 2026 Jul. 25];13(3). Available from: https://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/1293

Article Details