Evaluating Biomarker Dynamics in Breast Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study Biomarker Dynamics in Breast Cancer Post-NAC

Kiruthikasri G (1), Adil Aziz Khan (2), Samreen Zaheer (3), Sana Ahuja (4), Sufian Zaheer (5)
(1) Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India, India,
(2) Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India, India,
(3) Department of Radiotherapy, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India, India,
(4) Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India., India,
(5) Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India., India

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is integral to breast cancer management, yet its influence on biomarkers, notably androgen receptor (AR), remains underexplored. This study examines post-NACT alterations in receptor status, including ER, PR  AR, HER2 and Ki67 index in breast cancer patients.


Methods: A cross-sectional study, spanning three years at a tertiary care center, enrolled patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing mastectomy post-NACT. Pre- and post-NACT specimens underwent histological grading and immunohistochemistry for hormone status, HER2 status, and Ki67 index. Discordance between pre- and post-NACT receptor statuses and expression levels of biomarkers was assessed using McNemar’s and Wilcoxon signed rank tests respectively.


Results: Among 100 patients, 35 were assessed. Mean age was 43.83 years, with prevalent T1 tumors (34.3%) and N1 nodal involvement (37.1%). Post-NACT, 54.2% showed no histological grade change. Notable alterations included changes in ER (14.2%), PR (14.2%), and HER2 status (8.57%). AR expression showed a significant change following NACT (p=0.03), while ER expression exhibited a trend towards significance (p=0.06). Ki67 index decreased in only 5.7% of cases.


Conclusion: This study unveils intricate biomarker dynamics following NACT in breast cancer, with particular emphasis on AR, hitherto not evaluated. Larger investigations are imperative to elucidate clinical implications and tailor treatment strategies for breast cancer patients undergoing NACT.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.

Tsang JYS, Tse GM. Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer. Adv Anat Pathol. 2020;27:27–35. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000232.

Eliyatkin N, Yalcin E, Zengel B, Aktaş S, Vardar E. Molecular Classification of Breast Carcinoma: From Traditional, Old-Fashioned Way to A New Age, and A New Way. J Breast Health. 2015;11:59–66. doi: 10.5152/tjbh.2015.1669.

Shien T, Iwata H. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;50:225–9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz213.

Rey-Vargas L, Mejía-Henao JC, Sanabria-Salas MC, Serrano-Gomez SJ. Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile. BMC Cancer.2020;20. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07179-4.

Shaaban AM, Provenzano E. Receptor Status after Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer: Significance and Implications. Pathobiology. 2022;89:297–308. doi: 10.1159/000521880.

Ramteke P, Seenu V, Prashad R, Gupta SD, Iyer V, Deo SVS, et al. Alteration in steroid hormone and Her-2/neu receptor status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: Experience at a tertiary care centre in India. Indian J Cancer. 2016;53:366–71. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.200669.

Al-Keilani MS, Elstaty RI, Alqudah MA, Alkhateeb AM. Immunohistochemical expression of substance P in breast cancer and its association with prognostic parameters and Ki-67 index. PLoS One. 2021;16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252616.

Arafah MA, Ouban A, Ameer OZ, Quek KJ. KI-67 LI Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients and Its Significance. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2021;15. doi: 10.1177/11782234211016977.

Gahlaut R, Bennett A, Fatayer H, Dall BJ, Sharma N, Velikova G, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer phenotype, ER/PR and HER2 expression - Implications for the practising oncologist. Eur J Cancer. 2016;60:40–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.006.

Avci N, Deligonul A, Tolunay S, Cubukcu E, Olmez OF, Ulas A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced changes in immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and Ki-67 in patients with breast cancer. Journal of BUON. 2015;20:45–9. PMID: 25778295

Katayama A, Miligy IM, Shiino S, Toss MS, Eldib K, Kurozumi S, et al. Predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment and changes to post-neoadjuvant HER2 status in HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:1271–81. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00738-5

Kinsella MD, Nassar A, Siddiqui MT, Cohen C. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5:530. PMID: 22949935

Lee HC, Ko H, Seol H, Noh DY, Han W, Kim TY, et al. Expression of Immunohistochemical Markers before and after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Carcinoma, and Their Use as Predictors of Response. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:395–403. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.4.395.

Authors

Kiruthikasri G
Adil Aziz Khan
Samreen Zaheer
Sana Ahuja
Sufian Zaheer
sufianzaheer@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
1.
G K, Khan AA, Zaheer S, Ahuja S, Zaheer S. Evaluating Biomarker Dynamics in Breast Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study: Biomarker Dynamics in Breast Cancer Post-NAC. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. [cited 2024 Oct. 3];11(4). Available from: https://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/986

Article Details